Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue10-101

Improving Critical Thinking In English Language Clasrooms Through Engaging Activities

Raximova Muslima Dilshodjon kizi , Student Аt Namangan Stаtе Institute Оf Foreign Languages Nаmеd Аftеr Is’hоkkhоn Ibrаt, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of promoting critical thinking skills in English language classrooms. It explains how language learning naturally supports deeper thinking, and offers a variety of interactive activities—such as debates, role-plays, story completion, and problem-solving tasks—that help students become thoughtful, independent learners. The article also highlights the teacher’s key role in guiding this process through questions, feedback, and age-appropriate tasks. Practical examples from both primary and secondary levels are included. The conclusion emphasizes that critical thinking not only improves English proficiency but also prepares students for real-life decision-making and problem-solving.

 

Keywords

Critical thinking, exploration, types of games, debate

References

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools (5th ed.) Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Pearson.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. ASCD.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longman.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching Children to Think (2nd ed.). Nelson Thornes.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Raximova Muslima Dilshodjon kizi. (2025). Improving Critical Thinking In English Language Clasrooms Through Engaging Activities. International Journal of Pedagogics, 5(10), 415–417. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue10-101