Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue01-33
Linguocognitive Analysis Of Homonyms (Using Uzbek And Turkish Languages As Examples)
Abstract
World linguistics conducts research aimed at studying linguistic units within the comparative-historical and systemic-structural paradigm. Additionally, special attention is given to the study of the anthropocentric paradigm - specifically, investigating the semantics of linguistic units based on cognitive, psycholinguistic, and pragmatic approaches. Of practical significance are the analysis of speech mechanisms, worldview, processes of reflecting existential information in linguistic consciousness, assimilation of word meanings and retention of concepts in linguistic memory, perception of object and event characteristics, semantic development of lexemes, and lexical clarification of the form-content relationship in understanding meaning through a linguacognitive approach.
This article analyzes the linguacognitive characteristics of homonyms and their usage statistics in the Uzbek and Turkish languages.
Keywords
Lexical homonymy, homoneme, semanteme, interlingual homonymy, polysemy
References
Mirtojiyev M. Polysemy in the Uzbek language. - Tashkent: Fan, 1975. - 31 p.
Musabayeva Z. Homonyms in Mahmud Kashgari's "Divan-u Lughat at-Turk" (11th century): Abstract of dissertation for Candidate of Philological Sciences. - Frunze: 1975. - P.11.
Rahmatullayev Sh. Dictionary of Uzbek Homonyms. - Tashkent, 1984. - 214 p.
Shaker I.T. Lexical non-derived noun homonyms and their representation in dictionaries. Abstract of dissertation for Candidate of Philological Sciences. - Voronezh, 2013. - 25 p.
Shaykevich A.Ya. On the principles of homonym classification // Processes of language development. - Moscow, 1959.- P. 127.
Asker R. Divanü Lugat-it-Türk Statistics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Turkology Research Symposium: Mahmud al-Kashgari and his era (28-30 May 2008) [e-book] /Ankara: Turkish Language Association, 2022. - P.64-65.
Uçar A. Semantic Relatedness: The Distinction Between Polysemy and Homonymy in Turkish Verbs [Anlambilimsel Bağlantılılık: Türkçe Eylemlerde Çokanlamlılık ve Eşadlılık Ayrımı] 2009, In S. Ay, Ö. Aydın, İ. Ergenç, S. Gökmen, S. İşsever and D. Peçenek (Eds.), Essays on Turkish Linguistics: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, 6-8 August 2008, - P.207 - 216.
Hadra Kübra, Erkinay Tamtamış. A Historical Journey from Polysemy to Homonymy [Çok Anlamlılıktan Eş Adlılığa Doğru Tarihsel Bir Yolculuk] folk/ed. Journal, 2022; 28 (1) - P. 109.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdurahmanova M.T.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.