This article theoretically summarizes the integrity of style and task in Uzbek literary criticism using the example of scientific thinking by Matyakub Kushzhanov , in addition, using the example of the work “Soul and Appearance”, the academician’s theoretical views on the renewal of poetic thinking and aesthetic principles in Uzbek literary criticism of the 70s of the twentieth century are shown. Also, from a scientific and theoretical point of view, the critic’s opinions regarding the skill of using literary information and scientific facts, the creative spirit and critical views are analyzed.

In world literature, serious attention is paid to the mediating role of critical thinking, the relationship between hypothesis and fact, the nature of the process of interdisciplinary integration, the designation of the paradigm of literary criticism, the consideration of literary traditions and innovative skills, the choice of the author's concept and the position of the researcher. World literary criticism has accumulated a wealth of experience in defining the creative credo of a critic, describing the criteria of a scientific approach and aesthetic evaluation, determining individual style and skill, and assessing the goals and objectives of theoretical interpretation. Studying the principles of poetic research into a logically connected life and the criteria for aesthetic evaluation of an essence as a complex complex, generalizing the spirit of creativity and the process of philosophical observation of logical syllogism, assessing the individual interpretation of the analysis of a scientific problem will bring clarity to the issues under consideration. The existing scientific and theoretical experience requires a serious study of the problems of analyzing literary criticism, the study of the creative originality of a hypothesis, fact and literary information helps to visualize the connection between language and speech as a whole.

When preparing the article, hermeneutic, structural, historical-comparative, functional methods, as well as microanalysis were used alternately. In the process of studying the problem, the skills and style of presentation as a whole were tested.

Literary criticism, style, task, aesthetic assessment, literary interpretation

Kushzhonov M. K alb va қ iyofa (Soul and appearance). - Tashkent: ed. “Literature and Art”, 1978. – P.41, 60.

Yuldoshev B. History of Uzbek literary criticism. – Tashkent: Science, 2023. – P. 12, 125-126.

Yuldoshev M. Literary text and the foundations of its linguistic and poetic analysis. -Tashkent: Science, 2006. - P.26.

Rasulov A. Badiylik - devil- free yangilik . - Tashkent: ed. "Shark", 2007. -P.266.

Bakhodir Karim. Rukhiyat alifbosi (ABC of the soul). - Tashkent: ed. "Literature and Art", 2016. - P.290.

Bursov B.I. Criticism as literature. - L., 1976.

Nazarov B. Uzbek literary criticism: ideology, method, hero. - T., 1979.

History of Uzbek literary criticism. T. 1-2. - T., 1987.

Kuronov D. Literary dictionary / D. Kuronov , Z. Mamajonov , M. Sheralieva. - Tashkent: ed. " Akademnashr ", 2013.