 Articles
                                    | Open Access | 																																		
														
				
								https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue10-04
                                                                                                                Articles
                                    | Open Access | 																																		
														
				
								https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue10-04
				
							                                The Role Of Interactive Methods In Developing Creative And Critical Thinking In Students
Abstract
Developing creative and critical thinking has become a central goal of modern education, yet traditional lecture-based approaches often fail to nurture these skills. This article explores how interactive teaching methods, such as group discussions, debates, role-play, problem-based learning, and digital platforms, promote student engagement, originality, and reflective reasoning. Using classroom observations, student feedback, and performance tasks with university learners, the study highlights improvements in creativity, logical argumentation, and collaboration. Findings suggest that interactive methods not only enhance learning outcomes but also foster a more supportive, learner-centered environment. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for educators seeking to integrate interactive approaches into higher education curricula.
Keywords
Interactive methods, creative thinking, critical thinking
References
Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Tools and Techniques to Help Students Question Their Assumptions. Jossey-Bass.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1.
6. Mirzayeva, N. (2024). IMPORTANCE OF IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING READING AND WRITING. Konferensiya 2024, 1(01).
Mirzayeva, N. (2025, May). The ARTISTIC PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF NATURE AND HUMAN RELATIONS IN THE STORIES OF SHUKUR KHOLMIRZAEV. In Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 01).
Mirzayeva, N. (2024). INNOVATIVE APPROACHES IN THE METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Konferensiya 2024, 1(01).
Mirzayeva, N. (2025, May). The THE CONCEPT OF ARTISTIC PSYCHOLOGISM IN LITERARY STUDIES AND THE HISTORY OF THE ISSUE. In Conferences (Vol. 1, No. 01).
Nigmatovna, Y. N. (2024). Bilimlаrni individuаllаshtirish orqаli o ‘quvchilаrdа lingvistik kompetentsiyalаrni shakllantirishni tashkilashtirish. american journal of education and learning, 2(5), 976-982.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nasiba Mirzayeva Bakhtiyar kizi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
