 Articles
                                    | Open Access | 																																		
														
				
								https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue09-21
                                                                                                                Articles
                                    | Open Access | 																																		
														
				
								https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue09-21
				
							                                Metaphorical Conceptualizations Of Sovereignty And Security In International Politics
Abstract
This article investigates the metaphorical conceptualizations of sovereignty and security in international politics, emphasizing how metaphors shape perceptions of authority, statehood, and protection. Sovereignty is often framed through metaphors of territorial integrity, such as “national borders as walls” or “state as a house,” highlighting control, stability, and independence. Security, in turn, is conceptualized through metaphors of protection and defense, including “shields”, “fortresses”, and “barriers”, which reinforce ideas of safety against external threats. By analyzing political speeches, policy documents, and media reports, the study demonstrates how metaphorical framing legitimizes political strategies and influences international relations. These conceptual metaphors are not universal but culturally variable, reflecting diverse geopolitical contexts and ideological orientations. The findings underline the crucial role of metaphor in constructing political realities, showing that sovereignty and security are not merely legal categories but discursive constructs shaped by linguistic choices.
Keywords
Metaphor, sovereignty, security
References
Buzan, B., Waever, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. pp. 21–46, 65–89.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. pp. 141–168, 201–226.
Dunn, K. C. (2003). Imagining the Congo: The International Relations of Identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 74–96, 181–205.
Fierke, K. M. (1998). Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 37–62, 117–138.
Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge. pp. 14–39, 89–112.
Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 27–51, 133–158.
Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason: How Metaphors Structure What We Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 56–77, 145–168.
Neumann, I. B. (1996). Russia and the Idea of Europe: A Study in Identity and International Relations. London: Routledge. pp. 33–58, 121–143.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dadamirzayeva Mokhidil Gulomjon qizi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
