Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume03Issue01-03
SOCIOLINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF GENDER DISCOURSE IN THE SYSTEM OF DIFFERENT LANGUAGES
Abstract
In this article, it is revealed that to what extent is some languages are sexist, beginning with the reality that the women is also put under pressure through languages and, as it is in almost every social area, there is sexism against women in languages. The conceptual expressions (such as gender, sexist language, language and ideology) are brought out that the dimension and the quality of the world's languages and which perspectives the sexist language is usually seen. Gender discourse representing the opposite views has a side if political views have an effect on preferring sexist expressions. What is come into the view is that there is another cognition beyond social views in using sexist language. While there is no important difference in using sexist expressions according to the political views in some languages, they make a big contribution to the being the "secondary" and "other" of women.
Keywords
Language, gender, sociolinguistics
References
Donovan, Josephine. Feminist Teori, Çev. Aksu Bora, Meltem Ağduk Gevrek, Fevziye Sayılan, İletişim , İstanbul, 1997. p290.
Fishman P. ‘Interaction: the work women do’, in Barrie Thorne et al. (eds) Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, Mass.: – Newbury House, 1983. – p. 89.
Jespersen O. Language: its nature, development and origin. – London: Allen & Unwin, 1922; Haas M. ‘Men’s and women’s speech in Koasati’. Language 20, 1944. – p. 142–9.; Trudgill P. Sociolinguistics. – London: Penguin, 1974, 1983, 1995.
Pusch L. Das Deutche als Männer Sprache. Edition Suhrkamp.SV, 1984. – 201 s.
Sharma, J.C.. “An Introduction To Sirmauri-Grammatical Gender”, Language In India, Volume:1 , January, 2002. Ed. By SINGH, Ishtla; Jean Stillwell Peccei. Language , Society And Power , Routledge, New York, 1999. p33.
Sharma, J.C.. “An Introduction To Sirmauri-Grammatical Gender”, Language In India, Volume:1 , January, 2002. Ed. By SINGH, Ishtla; Jean Stillwell Peccei.Language , Society And Power , Routledge, New York, 1999. P77.
Tannen D. You Just Don’t Understand! Women and men in conversation. – London: Virago, 1991; Maltz D.N., Borker R.A. Mißverständnisse zwischen Männern und Frauen - kulturell betrachtet // Günthner, Kotthoff (Hrsg) Von fremden Sttimmen. Weibliches und männliches Sprechen im Kulturvergleich. – Frankfurt am Main, 1991. – S. 52-74.
Tromel-Plötz S. Linguistic und Frauensprache // Linguistische Berichte. 1978. – S. 186-196.
Van Dijk Teun A., Walter Kintsch, Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. – New York: Academic Press, 1983. – p. 83.
Герасимов В.И., Петров В.В. На пути к когнитивной модели языка // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. – Вып. 23. – Когнитивные аспекты языка. – М., 1988. – С. 6.
Клюев Ю.В. Дискурс в массовой коммуникации (междисциплинарные характеристики, концепции, подходы). Вестник СПбГУ. Сер. 9. 2013. Вып. 1. – С. 208.
Семенова И.В. Гендерный аспект концептуального анализа лексем “мужчина” и “женщина” (на материале фразеологии английского, русского и кабардинского языков): Дисс. … канд.филол.наук. – М., 2006. – С. 128.