Chastushka is a traditional form of Russian folk poetry that encapsulates humor, social commentary, and cultural reflection in a compact verse structure. This study delves into the historical origins and evolution of chastushka, examining its significance in Russian culture. We explore the linguistic features that define chastushka, including its rhyme schemes, rhythm, and use of colloquial language, which offer insights into regional dialects and the socio-linguistic landscape of Russia. The performance aspect of chastushka is also analyzed, highlighting its role in communal gatherings and celebrations, where spontaneity and audience interaction contribute to its enduring popularity. By investigating thematic elements such as love, daily life, and political satire, the research illustrates how chastushka serves as both entertainment and a medium for social reflection. This article underscores the importance of chastushka in understanding not only Russian folklore but also the dynamic relationship between language and culture. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study aims to contribute to the field of folklore linguistics and foster appreciation for this rich cultural tradition.

Chastushka, Russian folk poetry, cultural reflection

Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Waveland Press.

Dzhurinsky, A. (2010). Chastushka: The folk song of Russia. Russian Folklore Studies, 25(2), 45-60.

Khamitov, A. (2015). The role of humor in Russian folk culture: A study of chastushki. Journal of Slavic Folklore, 12(1), 23-37.

Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale (2nd ed.). University of Texas Press.

Tikhonov, A. (2018). Chastushka as a cultural phenomenon: Historical and linguistic perspectives. Folklore Research, 34(3), 112-130.

Uspensky, B. (1999). The language of Russian folk poetry. In M. T. Karpovich & S. L. Zaitsev (Eds.), Russian folklore and literature: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 87-102). Academic Press.

Volkov, A. (2012). Folk traditions in modern Russia: The case of chastushki. Slavic Review, 71(4), 789-805.