
STRATEGIES AND CHALLENGES IN TEACHING RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AT CHINESE UNIVERSITIES
Abstract
This study investigates the strategies and challenges associated with teaching the Russian language in Chinese universities. As global interconnectedness increases, the demand for multilingual proficiency has heightened, with Russian emerging as a significant language of interest in China due to geopolitical and economic factors. This research examines current pedagogical approaches, curriculum design, and instructional practices employed in Chinese higher education institutions. It explores the various strategies implemented to enhance Russian language acquisition, including the integration of technology, immersive learning experiences, and collaborative teaching methods. Additionally, the study identifies and analyzes the key challenges faced by educators, such as limited resources, varying levels of student motivation, and cultural barriers. Through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, including surveys, interviews with educators, and classroom observations, the research provides a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness of current teaching practices and the obstacles that hinder successful language instruction. The findings offer valuable insights for improving Russian language education in China, suggesting actionable recommendations for curriculum development, teacher training, and resource allocation to better support language learners and enhance educational outcomes.
Keywords
Russian language, Chinese universities, language teaching strategies
References
Donskaya, T.(1999), “Russian language methodology sketches”. Saint-Petersburg: “Sudarinya” Press, 160.
Emirziadi, L.V. (2013), “Russian Language in China: Past and Present" [Russkii yazyk v Kitae: istoriya i sovremennost', Rusistika v Kitae: traditsii i innovatsii: materialy Mezhd. nauch.-prakt. konf. Tsitsikar, KNR, 23-26 okt. 2013 g., Zlatoust, St. Petersburg, 16- 19.
Frumkina R.M. (2004), “Psycholinguistics: what are we doing while speaking and thinking”. Working paper WP6/2004/04. Moscow State University, Higher School of Economics, 24 (in Russian).
Glukhov B. A, Shukin A. N. (1993), “The terms of teaching methods of Russian language as a foreign” / Journal:“The Russian language”, Moscow.
Leontev A.A. (2005), “The basis of psycholinguistics” .Psychology for students, Moscow: Academia. 288.
Leontev A.A. (2003), “The word in the voice activities”. Moscow: Nauka.83-92.
Ostanenko A. (1987), “Teaching Russian grammar to foreign students on initial stage”. Moscow: Russian language, 144 p.
Saporta S.(2004),” Relations between Psychological and Linguistic Units”//Psycholinguistics. Baltimore.
Scherba L.V. (1994), “The experience of the general theory of lexicography”.(p.69). Moscow: Nauka.
Tan, A., (1991),” Grammar in Chinese traditional science”. Moscow: Philological science 5, 69-75.
Vigotskij L.S. (2005),”Thinking and speech”. Moscow: Labirint.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sesegma Balzhirova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.