
Issues of Implementation of Article 10bis Of the Paris Convention into National Legislation
Abstract
This article examines the issues related to the implementation of Article 10bis of the Paris Convention (1883) into national legal systems, with a particular focus on the legislation of the United States and the Republic of Uzbekistan. Special attention is given to the analysis of the principle of “effective protection against unfair competition,” its substance, and the challenges of its implementation under contemporary conditions. A comparative analysis is conducted of the legislative approaches currently in force in the United States (Lanham Act, Sherman Antitrust Act, Federal Trade Commission practice), the European Union (TFEU, EU Directives), Japan (UCPA), and Uzbekistan (the 2023 Law “On Competition”). The article identifies existing enforcement issues related to digital platforms, the use of artificial intelligence, transnational cases of unfair competition, and the regulation of commercial data. The study substantiates the need for further modernization of legislation to ensure comprehensive legal protection in line with international standards under the Paris Convention.
Keywords
Paris Convention, Article 10bis, unfair competition
References
F.3d 489, 5th Cir. 2000. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas - 80 F. Supp. 2d 600 (N.D. Tex. 2000) January 3, 2000. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/80/600/2565606/
Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Papa John’s Int’l, Inc., 227 F.3d 489 (5th Cir. 2000
Kaplow, 2013, The Antitrust Laws and Economic Analysis, p. 145
U.S. 159, 1995. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/159/
FTC Annual Report 2020. p.12.
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant. Case No. 18-cv-07548-AGT. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-n-d-cal/2201041.html
Lemley & McKenna, 2010, Irrelevant Confusion, Stanford Law Review, p. 413
Volkswagen Annual Report 2016, p. 34
Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2014). Intellectual Property Law (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. – p. 1160.
FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 405 U.S. 233 (1972).
Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Japan), Article 2(1)(i).
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003).
Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1–7.
Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
Directive 2005/29/EC on Unfair Commercial Practices – Official Journal of the EU, L 149, 11.06.2005.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adashov Khojiboy Khusanovich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.