Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue03-28

Cross-Linguistic Compatibility in Expressing Value Concepts

Kuchimova Parizod Tulqin qizi , Lecturer at Journalism and mass communication university, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines how different languages encode and express value concepts such as good vs. bad, moral worth, social norms, politeness, obligation, honor, and fairness, and the extent to which these concepts are compatible or divergent across linguistic and cultural systems. It explores semantic, pragmatic, and cultural factors that influence how values are lexicalized, grammaticalized, or implied in discourse. Cross-linguistic comparison highlights both universal tendencies (e.g., evaluative adjectives, modal expressions of obligation) and language-specific patterns shaped by cultural worldviews. By analyzing similarities and differences across languages, this topic contributes to understanding how language reflects cultural values and how communicative compatibility can be achieved in multilingual contexts.

Keywords

Cross-linguistic comparison, value concepts, linguistic relativity

References

Вежбицкая А. Язык. Культура. Познание. – М.: Русские словари, 1996. – 416 с.

Воробёв В.В. Лингвокультурология. – Москва: RUDN, 2008. – 340 с.

Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология: Учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб, заведений. – М.: Издательский центр «Академия», 2001. – 208 с. – С. 35.

Кубрякова Е.С. Язык и знание: На пути получения знаний о языке: Части речи с когнитивной точки зрения. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. – 560 с.

Арутюнова Н.Д. Дискурсивный анализ и концепты культуры // Лингвистический энциклопедический словарь. – М.: Наука, 1999. – С. 42-47.

Караулов Ю.Н. Русский язык и языковая личность. – М.: Наука, 1996. – 264 с.

Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. – 328 p.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Kuchimova Parizod Tulqin qizi. (2026). Cross-Linguistic Compatibility in Expressing Value Concepts. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(03), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue03-28