Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume06Issue03-25
Emotional Concept in The Worldview of Diverse Linguistic Systems: A Comparative Study of Metaphorical and Metonymic Models Of “Anger”
Abstract
This article explores the conceptualization of the emotion anger (referred to as “g‘azab” in Uzbek) within the worldview of diverse linguistic systems, drawing on conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual metonymy theory. Through a comparative analysis of metaphorical and metonymic models in typologically varied languages (primarily English, Uzbek, and Russian), the study identifies near-universal patterns rooted in embodied physiological experiences—such as anger is heat, anger is pressure, anger is fire, and anger is an opponent—while highlighting culture- and language-specific variations in salience, elaboration, and additional mappings. The research employs corpus-based and lexical approaches to examine linguistic expressions, idioms, and proverbs, demonstrating how embodied universality interacts with cultural norms, social values, and contextual factors to shape folk models of anger.
Keywords
Anger conceptualization, conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy
References
Barcelona, A., & Soriano, C. (2004). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Mouton de Gruyter.
Buzrukova, D. M. (2024). Olamning hissiy-lisoniy manzarasida “muhabbat” konseptining lingvokulturologik va gender tahlili. Monografiya. Farg‘ona.
Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. John Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. Springer.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
Krasavskiy, N. A. (2000). Emotional conceptosphere of the German language. In Language personality: Problems of creative semantics. Volgograd: Peremena.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Mahmudov, N. (1995). Til va tafakkur. Toshkent: Fan.
Mahmudov, N. (2015). Olamning lisoniy manzarasi va so‘z o‘zlashtirish. O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 3, 3–10.
Mahmudov, N., & Xudoyberganova, D. (2013). O‘zbek tili o‘xshatishlarining izohli lug‘ati. Toshkent: Ma’naviyat.
Myagkova, E. Y. (2000). Emotional-sensory component of word meaning. Kursk.
Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Cognitive linguistics. Moscow: AST.
Rahmatullayev, Sh., Mahmudov, N., Xolmanova, Z., O‘razova, I., & Rixsiyeva, K. (2022). O‘zbek tili frazeologik lug‘ati. Toshkent.
Sirajiddinov, Sh. (2018). Olam manzarasi tushunchasiga doir. O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 2, 80–86.
Steen, G. J., et al. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. John Benjamins.
Ulitskaya, L. E. (2015). Lestnitsa Yakova. Moscow: AST.
Vezhbitskaya, A. (1999). Semantic universals and description of language. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury.
О‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. (2006–2008). 5 vols. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ashurbaeva Sarvinoz Kholmirzaevna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.