Abstract
The article provides general information about language phenomena, artificial intelligence and their connection with knowledge, thinking, memory, etc. In addition, the approaches and opinions of scientists on these topics are presented and explained with the help of examples. The author states that the movement of thinking and the formation of thought is associated with cognitive activity, a process that ensures the reflection of reality directly in the mind.
It is known that the formation of speech units and their understanding are the result of mental activity. The performance of this activity is directly related to the condition of obtaining linguistic knowledge. There is no way to know reality without linguistic knowledge, to lyrically express logical structures that reflect information about the current event-events. However, at the intersection of cognitive science, six fields of science are adjacent, and a single scientific goal is to be occupied with the search for a solution to the problems of concentration, processing and application of knowledge in natural and artificial systems. It seems-that interrelation between these areas does not take place in the same way, whereas, Artificial Intelligence and anthropological philosophy are directly related. Meanwhile, human cognitive activity should be considered not as a reflection of being as a mirror, but as a phenomenon that reflects the inner or outer essence of objects. The mental structure formed in the process of cognition – the content of the concept is occupied by character-features that have a clear appearance of exactly this type, and the same features lead in the linguistic reality of the concept.
Keywords:
language structures, cognitive activity, language economy
References
Safarov Sh. Cognitive linguistics. –Jizzak, 2000.
Rasulov Z.I. The Role of the Context and Situation in Intertextuality. Web of Semantic. Universal Journal of Innovative Education. Volume 2 Issue 5, Year 2023. ISSN: 2835-3048
Ludwig von Bertalanffy . General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series. George Braziller, Incorporated, 2015. -295 p.
Соссюр де Ф. Труды по языкознанию. –М.:Прогресс, 1977. –С.154.
Weisgerber L. Grundzüge der inhaltbezogeneu Grammatik. –Düsseldorf: Pädegogischer Veil. Schwan, 1962. -267s.
Émile Benveniste. Le sorgenti segrete di un linguista poliedrico. Edizioni ETS, 2021. -142 p.
Мухин А.М. Лингвистический анализ. Теоретические и методологические проблемы. –Л.:Наука, 1976. –С.30.
Мухин А.М. Функциональный синтаксис Функциональная лексикология. Функциональная морфология. –С.Пб.: Нестор-История, 2007. – С.106-107.
Фрей А. Грамматика ошибок. –М.:КомКнига, 2006. –С. 23.
Brugmann K. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. –Strassburg, 1904. –S.292.
Stern G. Meaning and Change of Meaning. –Göteborg,1931. -P. 273.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=BMFYYzIAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citft=1&citft=2&citft=3&email_for_op=zubaydullorasulov%40gmail.com&citation_for_view=BMFYYzIAAAAJ:hMod-77fHWUC
