Articles | Open Access |

Optimizing Security And Performance In Microservices Architectures: A Comprehensive Study On Grpc, API Management, And Intelligent Testing

Johnathan Reed , Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

Microservices architectures have become the cornerstone of modern software development, enabling scalable, flexible, and resilient systems. Despite their advantages, the distributed nature of microservices introduces substantial challenges in communication efficiency, security, and testing reliability. This study investigates the integration of advanced communication protocols, encryption methods, and intelligent testing frameworks to enhance both security and performance in microservices ecosystems. Specifically, we examine gRPC as a high-performance communication protocol compared to traditional REST and SOAP approaches, emphasizing the role of HTTP/3 and AES-256 encryption in securing inter-service communication (Khan & Ahamad, 2024; Newton Hedelin, 2024; Sangwai et al., 2023). Further, we explore the adoption of machine learning-based test automation to improve fault detection and coverage effectiveness, analyzing its impact on development workflows and software quality (Nama et al., 2021; Kochhar et al., 2015; Inozemtseva & Holmes, 2014). The study also examines API management practices and contract testing strategies to ensure reliable interactions in distributed environments (Owen, 2025; Sagar Kesarpu, 2025). Additionally, the integration of security controls within DevSecOps pipelines is assessed, highlighting both the challenges and practical solutions for contemporary software development (Sinan et al., 2025; Mousavi et al., 2025). Our findings demonstrate that leveraging modern communication protocols, robust encryption, intelligent testing, and structured API management significantly enhances the performance, reliability, and security of microservices-based systems. These insights provide a foundation for both academic research and practical implementation in industrial software engineering environments.

Keywords

Microservices, API Management, Machine Learning Testing

References

Khan, I., & Ahamad, M. K. (2024). Enhancing Security and Performance of gRPC-Based Microservices using HTTP/3 and AES-256 Encryption.

Mousavi, Z., Islam, C., Babar, M. A., Abuadbba, A., & Moore, K. (2025). Detecting misuse of security APIs: A systematic review. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(12), 1–39.

Nama, P., Meka, N. H. S., & Pattanayak, N. S. (2021). Leveraging machine learning for intelligent test automation: Enhancing efficiency and accuracy in software testing. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 3(01), 152–162.

Newton Hedelin, M. (2024). Benchmarking and performance analysis of communication protocols: A comparative case study of gRPC, REST, and SOAP. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

Owen, A. (2025). Microservices Architecture and API Management: A Comprehensive Study of Integration, Scalability, and Best Practices.

Sangwai, A., Sapale, S., Ghodake, S., & Jadhav, R. (2023). Barricading system-system communication using gRPC and protocol buffers. 2023 5th Biennial International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE), 1–5.

Sharma, S. (2021). Modern API Development with Spring and Spring Boot: Design highly scalable and maintainable APIs with REST, gRPC, GraphQL, and the reactive paradigm. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Sinan, M., Shahin, M., & Gondal, I. (2025). Integrating Security Controls in DevSecOps: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Research Directions. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 37(6), e70029.

Štefanič, M. (2021). Developing the guidelines for migration from RESTful microservices to gRPC. Brno.

Greiler, M., Herzig, K. & Czerwonka, J. (2015). Code Ownership and Software Quality: A Replication Study. 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), Florence, Italy, pp. 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2015.8

Hassan, A. E. (2009). Predicting faults using the complexity of code changes. 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070510

Inozemtseva, L., & Holmes, R. (2014). Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad India, pp. 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568271

Sagar Kesarpu. (2025). Contract Testing with PACT: Ensuring Reliable API Interactions in Distributed Systems. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(06), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue06-03

Kauppinen, M. (2005). Introducing requirements engineering into product development: towards systematic user requirements definition. Helsinki University of Technology. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/2625

Kochhar, P. S., Thung, F., & Lo, D. (2015). Code coverage and test suite effectiveness: Empirical study with real bugs in large systems. 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 560–564. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081877

Lazar, J. (2017). Research methods in human computer interaction. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Johnathan Reed. (2025). Optimizing Security And Performance In Microservices Architectures: A Comprehensive Study On Grpc, API Management, And Intelligent Testing. American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 5(07), 94–98. Retrieved from https://www.theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast/article/view/8061